People always put focus on everything about celebrities. Some people think celebrities’ views on politics should be appreciated, while others argue that it is unnecessary. As for me, I think it is no need to appreciate celebrities’ views on politics.
First of all, if people do not know celebrities’ views on politics, the celebrities can place more emphasis on their professional skills, which creates a great performance for the public. For example, when the actor, Peter avoided telling his political trend, he put all his energy into acting. Without any disturbing, he kept learning how to be an excellent actor and how to perform better. After trying and practicing with no bothering, he became the international-famous acting star possessing high-level expression skills. He even got a lot of invitations to participate in Hollywood movies. Consequently, it was a lack of political issue that allowed him to devote himself to acting and finally proved himself to be an outstanding actor.
Secondly, it can make the atmosphere of society more harmonic without any appreciation of celebrities’ political perspectives. For instance, Taiwanese people always place less focus on celebrities’ opinions of politics, thereby making no conflicts between people or between celebrities and fans. With a harmonic atmosphere of society, celebrities can easily advocate their thoughts about money donation, facilities constructions, and even the supervision to the government. Besides, people are all supportive of what celebrities did. Hence, without any political demonstration, it is easy to make individuals collaborate with celebrities harmonically and smoothly with no political bias.
Thirdly, there will be some troubles if people know or judge celebrities’ views on politics. Take Taiwanese singer, Sara, for example; when she showed her political view that DPP supporting, some fans of hers changed their original thoughts into the same political view of Sara to cater to her. Furthermore, Sara even used her influential ability to hold a lot of demonstrations to advocate her political thoughts, eventually brainwashing her fans to possess her political tendency. With her avocation, people lost their capabilities to distinguish the government’s behaviors. Instead, the only reason they support the DPP party is that the political tendency was the same as their idol’s, Sara’s. Thus, Sara really utilized her popularity to control people’s view of politics whatever the political perspective is good for society or not.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that it is useless for people to know celebrities’ points of view in politics. After all, without any politics involved, not only can it make the society harmonic but it can also allow the celebrities to focus on excel their performances.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57505773672 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31967486171 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517321016166 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.903199152 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77272727273 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232046052559 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775612956079 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574746434833 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142720609609 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0066380369772 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57505773672 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31967486171 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517321016166 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.903199152 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77272727273 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232046052559 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775612956079 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574746434833 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142720609609 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0066380369772 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.