logging
Both reading and lecture try to discuss Salvage logging process after forest fires and it affects on both forest and economy. In the reading section, the writer contends that damaged forest and economy benefit from salvage logging process and he provides three reasons for support; however, the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that maybe this process help forest recovery but in the long run, it leads to damages to forest and its economic effects is questionable.
First of all, the writer claims that since dead trees’ decomposing takes many years, it will obstruct growing new trees; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that clearing damage forest would not necessarily a good condition for trees growth and also, dead trees enrich soil and removing them may lead to reducing necessary nutrient in the soil.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that can be beneficial for the health of forest because insects such as spruce bark beetle can damage healthy trees; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that these insects are not major problem for forest and also, damage trees are good habitats for birds that can be good contributor for forests.
in addition, the writer mentions that since salvage logging has positive effects on the economy due to providing usable wood for industries and increasing job position; conversely, the professor indicates that these positive effects are small and do not last long. The process of recovery needs a helicopter and expensive instruments and also, it provides temporary jobs that need an experienced person from outside so it cannot a beneficial job for local residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t can be good contributor for forests. in addition, the writer mentions that sinc...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28762541806 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.137123745819 0.158904122519 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100334448161 0.0723426182421 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0468227424749 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0267558528428 0.0277247811725 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123745819398 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49267959375 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0167224080268 0.0208969081088 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0903010033445 0.128158765124 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234113712375 0.0158828679856 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133779264214 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1690.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21323529412 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.426470588235 0.374372842146 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.319852941176 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1875 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110294117647 0.113142543107 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49267959375 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 59.2840329157 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 45.3333333333 21.7502111507 208% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7635851281 49.3711431718 186% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 281.666666667 132.220823453 213% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.3333333333 21.7502111507 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 0.878197800319 247% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 77.318627451 50.5018328374 153% => OK
Elegance: 2.15873015873 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634546017741 0.549887131256 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.224970181069 0.142949733639 157% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0663664382233 0.0787303798458 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.829972095684 0.631733273073 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146639574061 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499289522649 0.266732575781 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523728994392 0.103435571967 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.285962570334 0.414875509568 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0263672451379 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439665522519 0.40443939384 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462392607726 0.0528353158467 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.