Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have
the reading passage is about stating three main criticism of buzzing, an approach to marketing new products. The speaker, however, disagrees with the idea, and casts doubt on the reasons mentioned in the reading passage.
To start with, the reading part argues that customers should be aware of the fact that if a person is getting money to advertise a specifiic product. In the contrast, the lecturer who is a part-time buzzer, maintains that buzzers do not give a wrong impression. In fact, it is true that they get payed, but they just use the product and share their experience of using it with other people. So, people would know how is the product in real.
The second issue raised by the reading is that consumers will not ask many questions about the product. On the contrary, the speaker outlines the fact that it is totally vice-verca. Since the consumers do not know that are speaking to a buzzer, they ask many questions about the price, services and how long have been used by the person. As a result, if the product is not good enough, people will not buy it simply.
Finally, the reading stand by the view that such advertising strategies will make harm to inter-personal relationships. Conversely, the lecturer dismisses this issue by mentioning the fact that if the product have acceptable quality, people will end up being more trustfull and open to meet new people. it is obvious that a bad product could not be recruited and advertised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading passage is about stating three ...
^^^
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would know how is the product in real. The second issue raised by the reading i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... trustfull and open to meet new people. it is obvious that a bad product could not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, if, second, so, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87698412698 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61607575497 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6647771809 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5384615385 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085139703658 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289201355474 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440013643173 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494544379681 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473957770352 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.