Both the reading and the lecture, discuss the idea that the humpback whales used stars for navigation. The author argues that the whales have the capacity to follow the stars' patterns. However, the professor refutes this idea by stating that the presented functions could be assigned to other functions.
To begin with, the passage claims that whales are smart and complex creature since they have powerful brains. Thus, he suppozed that they are capable of knowing the orientation through sound based techniques.
However, the lecturer rebuts this belief by pointing out that there's no connection between intelligence and following stars since some birds such as the duck which is not smart can follow the stars. Thus, It's just the extinct.
Secondly, The author asserts that whales migrate in straight lines for long distances. The fact that they couldn't rely on land indications made him belive that they follow the stars.
Nevertheless, the lecturer challenges this idea by mentioning that whales use a substance which is sensible to the magnetic field. Hence, the whale relies on external forces other than the stars.
Ultimately, according to the passage humpback whales could be spy-hopping since they were noticed exhibiting unusual behavior while floating and looking straightly.
Yet, the professor refuses this claim. She explains the sharks hunt by skyhopping and even during the day. Which indicates that this hypothesis is incorrect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...rebuts this belief by pointing out that theres no connection between intelligence and ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... for long distances. The fact that they couldnt rely on land indications made him beliv...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... by skyhopping and even during the day. Which indicates that this hypothesis is incor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41228070175 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51136229905 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609649122807 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.194821215 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194157543732 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061227930016 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631413928313 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879651185356 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599010554484 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.