The essay is about advantages of team work in a new project. To be specific, it talks about the positive impact of group work in a project but the lecture opposes the essay by presenting negative consequences working in a team.
To begin with, according to the author, workers get more resources and it is helpful to generate grandiose solutions to the project implementation. On the contrary, lecturer claims that the people get more time and free ride and do not concentrate on their duties which is not beneficial to the project. Workers do not feel responsible for the task that are provided to them.
Secondly, the author of the essay claims that workers feel better to work as they are decision makers. Whereas, listening section contradicts it and says that there is no any recognition but as a whole. No name is listed as a reward. It results developing attitude towards the project and team members. Moreover, project can not move very quickly as there are so many meetings to discuss and develop the strategies of project and more time is needed for consent.
Finally, according to the essay, workers get more chance for their recognition or to shine but the speaker do not agree and says that when an influence-able person says something about project it may affect the whole developing idea and drop the whole work. The whole project may convenience by a person so people with creativity do not get chance. Unfortunately, if the project fails, all the members are responsible though they are not related to the developed idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...n contradicts it and says that there is no any recognition but as a whole. No name...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75053212983 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3288035457 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18947089081 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746665089548 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674673841057 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118583822542 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371449491329 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.