It is true that academic sectors are focusing on harmonious and closer relationship among teachers and students for the magnificent result. To be specific, they are emphasizing on familiar environment in the school among students and educator to have better result. In today's education system, it is believed that having class with teachers who can develop content with students is effective than the teacher having excellent knowledge. I am concurred with the idea that students can memorize for long term and understand better if the speakers correlate subject matter with them. Moreover, if they do not have technique to connect the content and the perceiver, though they have better understanding about it, it is not beneficial. I firmly believe that the consequences is reliant upon teachers' delivery technique. I will explain these idea in the subsequent paragraph.
To begin with, Juveniles concentrate the subject matter if it is interested to them and it is only possible for teacher to attract their concentration. So, speakers need to create familiar atmosphere in the classroom. Moreover, it is plausible that students can perceive the subject matter easily and long term memory can be created if the examples. I have to admit that my own opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. Before five years ago, when I was in tenth standard, I had a science teacher who used to give abundant examples to the topic for his subject from our surroundings. For this reason, it was easy to understand the the subject matter whether the subject was hard for students. As a result, most of the students got A+ in the final exam. He was really exemplary from our school and awarded many times for being best teachers.
Secondly, when teachers are successful to synthesis their course and relationship with students, they find friendly environment which is more efficient to motivate students towards their study. Progenies do not feel loaded for the course and enjoy it as it is taught creating sound environment. Not only this, it substantially helps them to have long term memory set and positive influences towards class.
Finally, lecturers who only have better understanding about their course but do not have skills how to teach cannot produce better result in the academic area. Unfortunately, they may not have delivery technique though only qualifications. Some of the people can not make other understand in the level of their knowledge or let's say they are lacking method to make other understand which directly effect the result of students. Ultimately, that type of people are not good teachers but only good scholars having excellent knowledge in their field.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that to deliver the knowledge, person should have better technique to relate the subject matter with the youths so that they can easily ask what have not understood. To sum up, teachers should search easy way to make their assigned students feel more comfortable towards the course materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for long term and understand better if the speakers correlate subject matter wi...
^^
Line 1, column 834, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this idea' or 'these ideas'?
Suggestion: this idea; these ideas
...hers delivery technique. I will explain these idea in the subsequent paragraph. To begi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... this reason, it was easy to understand the the subject matter whether the subject was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... this reason, it was easy to understand the the subject matter whether the subject was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the best'.
Suggestion: being the best
...m our school and awarded many times for being best teachers. Secondly, when teachers a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...t substantially helps them to have long term memory set and positive influences towa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...y technique though only qualifications. Some of the people can not make other understand in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...tand in the level of their knowledge or lets say they are lacking method to make oth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as a result, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2571.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15230460922 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78515445046 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482965931864 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2911453289 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7916666667 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179179343611 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528100220297 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432727030723 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105934889264 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393422143736 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.