Mars, Earth, hydroponic, water, dangerous level, send human
In this set of material, both the author of the reading passage and the lecturer are discussing how it can be possible to send humans to Mars. Although author notifies that solving several problems would be required for the project of sending humans to Mars, the professor casts doubts on the author's claims, and she does not agree with the author even though she believes it is challenging. In what follows, the reasons for both the author and the lecturer will be substantiated.
Firstly, both of the passage and talk have a debate on food and water supplies. According to the reading, it is said that scientists should spend two years to go on Mars and come back to the earth, and the food and water supply can be challengeable. On the other hand, the professor states that they can cultivate hydroponic. This kind of plant needs a little space, and it can recycle the water. The scientists can also collect drink water and fresh air to their breath.
Secondly, the reading and the lecturer are discussing scientists' body problem. The author acclaims that there is a zero-gravity environment of space on the human body, and it leads to muscle mass reduction and less bone density. In contrast, the professor proclaims that other scientists once maintained many months in this situation. Moreover, several techniques can save their muscles mass. Scientists can do some exercises to prevent it.
Finally, the author of the passage asserts that some radiations emitted by the sun are dangerous for scholars. But, the professor believes these radiations are not at a critical level. Also, scholars can have some shielded clothes on Mars.
In conclusion, while the author announces that there are several issues sending humans on Mars, the professor express that these obstacles can be solved or are not crucial difficulties at all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97719869707 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.640370064 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524429967427 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9499960716 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8823529412 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217956478923 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575721140553 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460667064787 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107181949826 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429275093017 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.