Measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia
The reading passage accused that the european silver coin found in Maine is historical fake with several reasons, but the lecturer in the recording counterfacted all the points.
The first point mentioned by the passage is that the great distance between where the coin is found and where the european was presence made it impossible for the coin to travel that long, however, the lecturer suggest that the native american like to travel around and obtain different objects, making it possible for the coin to travel more than 1000 kilometers.
Secondly, the passage mentioned that there were no other silver coins being found, this is easily refuted by the lecturer that when the european went back to Europe, they pack al their valuables, including the silver coins, back to where they came from.
Lastly, the passage suggested the Norse would know that the silver coins can't work as money in America, but lecturer also acknowledge that the american would value unusual and attractive objects, they can use the silver coins as neckelece or jewellery, as long as they are interested in the silver coins, they are useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by the lecturer that when the european went back to Europe, they pack al their ...
^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Norse would know that the silver coins cant work as money in America, but lecturer ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 187.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0320855615 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36389042117 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 21.2450331126 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7424907676 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 235.25 110.228320801 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.75 21.698381199 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.25 7.06452816374 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 13.3589403974 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.25 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.0289183223 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.498013245 194% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.2008830022 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.