To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Agree or disagree?
The topics discuss about a better environment for education are always the hottest issue. when it comes to the question of to improve the quality of education, in the aspect on which should the universities spend more money on salaries for university professors, to a large extent, i disagree.
Firstly, I doubt the efficacy of increasing salaries for the university professors will improve the quality of education, mainly because the salary of university professors is rather stable and higher than average when compare to other occupation. if not adding enormous amount of money to the university professors, the ratio of the salary change has little effect to them, not to say that they will try to enhance their quality of teaching.
Secondly, spending more time on teaching such as preparing for materials for lectures or answering students' questions after class are indeed helpful in improving quality of education, however, increasing university professors' salaries will not give them extra time for their teachings. What occupy their time are mostly the researches they are having, perhaps lowering the number require for research paper submission can relief more free time for them, hence the time can be spent on teaching.
Thirdly, spending money on teaching assistants may have a better outcome in improving teaching quality than spending on universities professors. Most teaching assistants are require and responsible for teaching tutorial lessons, also answering students' questions, and marking students' exam paper. they may have greater need for money in which have greater effect on them to improve their skills in teaching and solving student's problems.
To sum up, as the above reasons shows that increasing university professors' salaries is not the major factor to improve teaching quality and have a greater effect if the target is instead on teaching assistants, I disagree with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...education are always the hottest issue. when it comes to the question of to improve ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...iversity professors, to a large extent, i disagree. Firstly, I doubt the eff...
^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...erage when compare to other occupation. if not adding enormous amount of money to ...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to enhance their quality of teaching. Secondly, spending more time on teaching...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er require for research paper submission can relief more free time for them, henc...
^^
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...rofessors. Most teaching assistants are require and responsible for teaching tutorial l...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...tions, and marking students exam paper. they may have greater need for money in whic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43521594684 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74555724191 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4450174949 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.6 100.406767564 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475921432569 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21008384303 0.076458572812 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16657795413 0.0737576698707 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289013883123 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120432360294 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 11.7677419355 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.