In most developed nations, high school is a part of every student’s life. During this time, students are faced with the burdensome task of mastering their essential subject material, getting ready to enter the work force or university, and dealing with their day-to-day school life. Educators, students, and professionals envision school uniforms as an excellent means of reducing these stresses and difficulties of students.
First, the families of students will benefit significantly by saving on the cost of clothing. A few uniforms are much more affordable than the many different pairs of clothing that a child needs everyday to attend school. Clothing, especially the more fashionable styles, tends to be quite an expensive burden that most parents feel forced to bear because of the desire to help their young children feel comfortable and socially accepted in school.
A second major advantage lies in the elimination of unnecessary distractions. Children often spend large parts of their day worrying about what to wear to look good in order to find acceptance in school. They spend this time not only to look good but also to avoid the ridicule that they might receive if they don’t dress trendy enough. By removing this pointless waste of time, students can spend more energy and effort focusing on important issues such as their studies.
Finally, a mandatory uniform policy will develop a sense of community within the school. Psychologically, seeing your fellow students wearing the same clothing as you offers a way to feel more closely connected. Because each student wears the same clothing regardless of income level or ability, uniforms keep students, at least with respect to appearance, on an equal level. This removes clothing as a factor that might serve to fracture the students into different groups.
The article is about the positive side of school uniforms as an excellent means of reducing student's stresses and difficulties of students and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the reasons don't provide valuable considerations that this policy will help and refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the article claims that the parents will save the significant cost of clothing of their children. However, the professor refuses this point by explaining that the parents will still, spend a large amount of money because uniforms are not available to free of cost and they have to buy from some specialties store which will, in turn, can be expensive.
Furthermore, no children will like them to wear a uniform when they are going out with friends and their parents need to buy trendy clothes for children as before.
Second, the article posits that this policy will eliminate unnecessary distractions. The professor refutes this by saying that it will not eliminate distractions. He states that the students will start more obsessing on looks and they tend to modify their uniform in which they can look more attractive because students are inclined to emphasize on attractive features and deemphasizing unattractive features. Thus, it will not reduce distractions as mentioned in the article.
Third, the article contends that this will develop a sense of community within the school. The professor opposes this point by claiming that forcing is not a way to build a sense of community. He explains that the student will lose their identity as an individual and this will serve to conformity because the student will lose their creativity, self-expression,etc..
qualities if they are forced. Moreover, the school's work is to foster such self-sense but this policy will counteract. So, this will not serve as its purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the professor explains that the reasons dont provide valuable considerations that th...
^^^^
Line 8, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...l lose their creativity, self-expression,etc.. qualities if they are forced. Moreo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...se their creativity, self-expression,etc.. qualities if they are forced. Moreove...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Qualities
...eir creativity, self-expression,etc.. qualities if they are forced. Moreover, the schoo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, third, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24503311258 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86195407128 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2559347447 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138667174418 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531386179578 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357687247126 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807664841755 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310687311537 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.