The most effective ways for the government to conserve energy is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity.
Nowadays, people do not feel comfortable with an increase in the cost of stuff controlled by the system. However, the government can do cultural activities such as advertising on television or in newspaper or so on to encourage them to use public transportation (for example) or frugal in fuel usage. While increasing the fuel cost may help the country’s economy, educating and cultural activities could be an effective procedure. I believe that it is far better to work on the mind of the people of the country to educate them to save fuel. There are several reasons for this, the most salient ones of which will be explained hereunder.
First, cultural activities have an appropriate response for people to save energy. The regime can teach the people of their country to save energy by improving the method of the people’s lifestyle and educate them to save fuel. It is impossible by advertising on television or teaching them how they can save energy and the method of using less fuel in lifestyle in different ways. For example, the system should make a television show. Of course, the government should teach the children in school and consider some courses about this topic.
Another important factor is that, improve the public transportation system. An increase in energy cost may be led to widespread public protests. While the increase in energy cost may produce a fundamental problems from the people of the country, improve the mass transit system can be an efficient way to decrease the usage of energy. For example, improve the sub-way system in which people could use them in a convenient matter.
In conclusion, I really believe that the government should teach the people of the country by a different methods to encourage them to save energy and the increase in energy cost is not an appropriate way. If the government uses the cultural method to learn the people to decrease the usage of the fuel it will get a very good response.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consider some courses about this topic. Another important factor is that, improv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...n energy cost may produce a fundamental problems from the people of the country, improve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could use them in a convenient matter. In conclusion, I really believe that the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'method'?
Suggestion: method
...he people of the country by a different methods to encourage them to save energy and th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... energy cost is not an appropriate way. If the government uses the cultural method...
^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fuel it will get a very good response.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, really, so, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89759036145 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75215509586 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442771084337 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5110590191 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180294510608 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668140549478 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461527640163 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126320679244 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301147658808 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.