The spread of the cane toads
Both the author and lecturer discuss the problem of the spread of cane toad. While the author advanced three hypotheses to account for this problem, the lecturer on the other hand, completely rejects whether mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about building a national fence. According to the passage, the fence can prevent the toads from moving into those parts of Australia that they have not yet colonized. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that this fence cannot carry the young toads or toad's eggs to move on the other side of the fence.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that some volunteers could capture and destroy the toads. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that these untrained volunteers may destroy many of frogs.
All in all, the reading asserts that researchers should develop a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad; however, the professor insists that using the viruses may include terrible environmental damage and it may change the habitats. The lecturer goes on to claim that these developed viruses may transfer to America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eloped viruses may transfer to America.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23316062176 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59523949972 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0961649447 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224027304676 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931861526415 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148827343809 0.0662205650399 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109697909185 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741509445963 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.