Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
In today's constantly connected world, the world is changing at a rapid pace because of the actions of human populations. As the population increases, the issue of how should individuals read and discuss news becomes more important. The issue of how should humans choose their reference when they want to discuss and read news has always been a controversial question among individuals all over the world. This matter can be considered from different aspects so that one can get new insight into this issue. While some humans think it is far better to read news which presented by a person who thinks the world of you and has the same idea with you on the same topic you want to know, I am inclined that people should read and watch news presented by the individual whose views are different from yours. The following paragraphs will illustrate my perspective.
To begin with, although it will be confusing and can cause a heated debate for you if you read or watch news presented by a person who thinks differently, there are some compelling reasons why news presented by the person with different viewpoints may benefit you in a great number of aspects. Reading news from a source that has same perspectives with you may be a monotonous activity, and you can break this monotony by choosing someone who has different viewpoints and thinks differently. In addition, I strongly believe watching the news from that source cannot bring fresh materials for you.
Furthermore, It is crystal clear that reading and watching news can strongly improve individuals' lifestyles in many aspects, such as thinking more logically or avoiding repeating their mistakes. In this regard, it is far better for humans to choose their source of information correctly. I think it would be no exaggeration of the fact if I said in this regard the most important factor is to choose a source from different viewpoints of your own. I strongly believe should humans read and watch the news from a person who has different ideas from theirs, not only will they be able to dispel their misconceptions, but they also can have fresh news and learn new things from different aspects that they never think before.
In conclusion, I am in agreement with the former statement and I do believe that should humans read the news presented by a person who thinks the world of them, they cannot be able to improve their lives and will not gather fresh information. All in all, I think individuals should choose their source in this way and never pay their attention to news from persons who think in their world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from persons who think in their world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82167042889 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65635836758 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440180586907 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3897842449 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.4 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5333333333 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327054566335 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115642615842 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904424158624 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209371558251 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608399675508 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.