migration of dinosaur
Both the author and the lecturer discuss the migration of a special kind of dinosaur (edmontosaur). While the author advanced three hypotheses to account for this claim, the lecturer state that the fundamental reason is yet to be discovered and none of the explanations put forth in the reading passage is adequate.
First, the author suggested that this kind of dinosaur migrate to the more hospitable region because there is no food in wintertime. However, the lecturer refutes this idea, arguing that warm temperature in summer causes many plants to grow and in the winter these plants died and they are enough adequately for edmontosaur feeding.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the fossils of edmontosaur skeleton show that they lived in the herd and so they migration each wintertime. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that many specious of animals live in the herd but they don’t migrate every year. The lecturer goes on to suggest that the animals live together because of many reasons such as extra protection against the predator.
Finally, the reading passage states that this kind of dinosaur had physically capable of migration. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that a kind of these animals didn’t have the capability of migration and she contradicts this reason.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, while, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13181818182 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67700261024 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.299340806 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23790894865 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118133167021 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117984422416 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149061776302 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263577640316 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.