Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In today's constantly connected world, the issue of students’ political knowledge has always been a controversial question among individuals all over the world. This matter can be considered from different aspects so that one can get new insights into this issue. While some persons think students should not be familiar with the political subject and these kinds of subject which always related to the government, I am inclined that individuals are the important part of each nation, and they play the most important role in the future of their country and also the fate of their children. If anyone teaches political subjects to their children, they would have a state-of-the-art country. The following paragraphs will illustrate my perspective.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that school is the best place for humans to learn any essential things in their life. I do believe that if students learned political and other subjects related to their regime, they would have a modern and advanced country. In this regard, teachers play the most significant role in the process of learning this crucial subject. If teachers learn this significant subject to their students, they would not only be familiar with political decisions that have a great influence on each person but also have a better future.
Furthermore, I do believe that if teachers taught political subjects to their students, their students would have a vivid imagination. Knowing about political subjects and other subjects related to the individual lifestyle and fate not only helps each person to has enough information about his/her country but also creates other vital imaginations in his/her mind which will be important in other aspects of his/her life. Should humans are familiar with this considerable subject, they will be successful in various parts of their life. I think having no information about the political and social subject will make the odds against prosperity.
In conclusion, although teaching political and social subjects may release some difficulties for teachers, they should consider this prime element in their classes. Should they consider this element, they will have a civil society. All in all, I totally disagree with the above statements and I do believe that not only teachers should consider this subject, but also parents should discuss political and social topics with their children in their close-knit family.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir children in their close-knit family.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31168831169 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71626721931 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47012987013 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4161937177 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252387833811 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100155623011 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078399045315 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175963218584 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494473507777 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir children in their close-knit family.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31168831169 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71626721931 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47012987013 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4161937177 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252387833811 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100155623011 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078399045315 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175963218584 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494473507777 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.