Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
In today's constantly connected world, the world is changing at a rapid pace, so should each individual consider different aspects in his/her method and try to take risks, he/she will be successful in his/her efforts. The issue of taking risks rather than doing only repetitive affairs has always been a controversial statement among individuals all over the world. While some people do believe that doing repetitive activities helps them to be successful in their duty, I am inclined that taking risks and trying to do new things has had a significant effect on each individual life in many aspects. In the following paragraphs, I will delve in to the most important reasons.
To begin with, no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the influence of innovation on the human's life and the whole world. I really believe that if humans always had done repetitive activities, we never would have such a contemporary world. Taking risks and trying to do new matters not only helps the planet to be a better place, but also helps each individual to has a better lifestyle. As a tangible example, if Steven Jabs had not had this crucial ability, we never would have this significant cellphone. There are many other examples, such as Christopher Columbus and many other persons, which mean this subject is a vital element in human's life.
Furthermore, should people utilize different approaches in their activity rather than make use of one method, they will decisively be successful in their activities. I do believe that the person who is only using one method that he/she knows and has experience with it, is always staying at his/her position and never has considerable success in his/her activities. In contrast, should humans utilize different methods and try to solve a problem in different ways, they will be an innovative person who always is successful in his/her jobs.
In conclusion, should humans take risks and do not afraid of doing hazardous affairs, they will have a state-of-the-art world. I do believe that this subject not only improves the human’s ability in solving difficult problems, but it also helps them to have a beneficial influence on the planet. All in all, I completely agree with the subject of taking risks and exploiting various approachs to doing our activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...t on the influence of innovation on the humans life and the whole world. I really beli...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ious approachs to doing our activities.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98955613577 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78452644482 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480417754569 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.922365523 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325940573498 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114932719715 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101553714666 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209478152166 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915099190233 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.