Ethanol Fuel
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether ethanol is a great alternative to gasoline or not. The passage claims that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading by citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about global warming and the influence of ethanol fuel on this considerable subject. According to the passage, if the use of ethanol fuel increased, it would not help the increase of global warming. In addition, burning ethanol will release a great deal of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that ethanol is producing from plants, and while the process of burning ethanol releases carbon dioxide, the process of growing plants will remove this harmful gas. As the plants utilize carbon dioxide, while they are growing, they could nullify the impact of carbon dioxide releasing from the burned ethanol.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecturer discuss the subject of utilizing plants by the production of ethanol. The author argues that the production of ethanol would incredibly reduce the number of plants accessible for uses other fuel. The professor validates the idea emphasizing that companies utilize plants that were not eaten by animals.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of the cost of burning ethanol. The passage goes on to mentions that this fuel could not compete with gasoline on price. In contrast, the professor points out that in the future, individuals stop buying ethanol, and as the production of this material increase, the cost of it will drop.
All in all, the author mentions that ethanol is not a significant alternative to gasoline. While the professor not only completely cast doubt on it but also demonstrates that using this fuel will have a great number of advantages for both humans and the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17080745342 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64734202816 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462732919255 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2279770756 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396291077035 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143068726105 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853022295877 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230488535624 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638362073129 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.