na
The passage and the lecture is about what is the best way to approach new projects. The author of the article states that new projects should be done in groups. While the lecture casts doubts on the claims made in the article. He claims that handing new projects to the group is not a good decision for various reasons.
First of all, the author claims that a group of people have a higher range of knowledge and expertise using which they can bring very creative solutions and take risky decisions. The author believes so because the responsibility spreads across the group instead of only one individual. The lecturer casts doubts on this claim. He claims that many individuals get a free ride as in a group only a few people do the work and the credit is shared by all. The few earnest workers never receive their deserved credit. Also, if due to the decision of few, some error happens, it will be blamed on all the members of the group.
Secondly, the author states that an individual has better chances to shine and get his voice heard in the group than individually. This point is challenged in the lecture. He says that there are instances of two or more people becoming domineering over others. And all decisions need to have their approvals. Furthermore, when a individual brings a new idea, these influential individuals will banish it if some loopholes are found without a second look.
In addition, the article also states that in a group, solutions will be provided quickly due to more number of people. But this is rebutted by the lecture by stating that it was observed more time was being taken to reach consensus in a group.
In conclusion, the lecture effectively disagrees to the claims stated in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... new projects should be done in groups. While the lecture casts doubts on the claims ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...have their approvals. Furthermore, when a individual brings a new idea, these inf...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74671052632 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54848245268 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6907328428 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.