The author talks to us about the solution proposed by ecologists for invasive species that cause many problems in North American, in the contrast, the speaker believes that these solutions are not efficient for destroying cheatgrass.
According to the author, the first option is that encouraging animals to feed on the cheatgrass. Animals such as cattle can graze in the fields where the cheatgrass is prevalent, this issue causes the cheatgrass to be reduced.
The second option is burning the cheatgrass. This plan allows the vast amounts of cheatgrass to be eliminated in a short time. this grass burns much more easily than the native plant species.
Another option is using fungus to attack cheatgrass. This plan is prevalent in Asia and Europe. North American also uses this plan to make slow the spread of cheatgrass.
The speaker says animals prefer to graze in the native plant field so native plants are destroyed by cheatgrass. Burning the cheatgrass harms the soil and does not mean the cheatgrass can't come back quickly again.
The fungal parasite just makes week or sick the cheatgrass and it does not mean the cheatgrass can't develop again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...grass to be eliminated in a short time. this grass burns much more easily than the n...
^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e soil and does not mean the cheatgrass cant come back quickly again. The fungal pa...
^^^^
Line 6, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...uickly again. The fungal parasite just makes week or sick the cheatgrass and it does...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ass and it does not mean the cheatgrass cant develop again.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05208333333 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56580071972 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8129835819 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285757953823 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993795469368 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631625282684 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136501337945 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486488774019 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.