novel reader decrease
The speaker contradicts the points with regards to three different points knowledge, culture and quality of novel as stated in passage by giving relevent points and examples that prove otherwise.
Firstly, he points out that as per passage high quality intellectual reading material is available only in novels and due to reduction in number of readers we are lacking in imagination and understanding of language. However this, according to speaker, is a misconception in reality there are other sourses of knowledge like science books and other types of books with information. Thus he unequivocally negates the information given in passage.
secondly, he opposes about information given in passage regarding decline in culture as well. he clarifies that culture is not affected by movies and music. The do not lower the culture. Furthermore, now a days novels are contemptory means of culture and now there is more than novels in the form of music and movies and this is indication of changing culture.
Thirdly, he denies the validity of another point that was averred on the passage with regards to difficulty level of writings. In passage it was stated that now good reader are available and good material is generating but no audience available to read this so the funds on writer is decreasing. In contrary of this point speaker explains that authors intended to write on more difficult level so audience of literature like have decreased over time. Furthermore he said that people from past will not prefer this literature due to its high difficulty level.
Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly substantiates his points with cogency
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...gination and understanding of language. However this, according to speaker, is a miscon...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... other types of books with information. Thus he unequivocally negates the informatio...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... the information given in passage. secondly, he opposes about information given in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...e regarding decline in culture as well. he clarifies that culture is not affected ...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re is not affected by movies and music. The do not lower the culture. Furthermore, now...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... do not lower the culture. Furthermore, now a days novels are contemptory means of culture...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 452, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...terature like have decreased over time. Furthermore he said that people from past will not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... due to its high difficulty level. Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly subs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24719101124 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84513078416 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543071161049 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6654206241 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144022963365 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384690916782 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543540451887 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642766954118 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343903346588 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.