decrease novel reading causes decline in literature value nd culture value.
The article states that recently young people are not reading novels as they used to do and this has led to a decline in the trend of reading, and hamper cultural values for both literature future and themselves. However, the professor disagrees with this opinion and mentioned her opinion about the same.
To begin with, the author states that if people are not reading novels then they don't have intellectual power, as novels are the source of the same and this also results in less imagination and understanding of language. However, the professor disagrees with this and explain that literature is not the only source of intellectual development, if people are reading history and other similar books, they are sufficient and good book to connect people with culture and enhance interest in culture.
To carry on another point, the author states that nowadays as people prefer watching television, watching videos, and web pages and this is also deviating people from cultural values. The professor sees flaws in this and explained that these television, web pages are contemporary sources of form to give knowledge to people. In fact, these are the diverse form of ways to view and imbibe cultural values.
Further, the author states that because people are not interested in literature, talented writers have to face a lot, as no one is buying these good books. In this, the professor explained that yes, this could cause loss to writers but this is not because of people, this is because writers nowadays are really difficult to understand. So he stated don't blame the reader for their failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...people are not reading novels then they dont have intellectual power, as novels are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this television' or 'these televisions'?
Suggestion: this television; these televisions
...r sees flaws in this and explained that these television, web pages are contemporary sources of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y difficult to understand. So he stated dont blame the reader for their failure.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, then, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03370786517 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54470610956 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501872659176 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8990895233 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145014436642 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575900460725 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839218883219 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096912342427 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078622109474 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.