The online encyclopedia
The passage expressed the three flaws of an online encyclopedias, and compared it to traditional printed version of encyclopedias. On the other hand the professor at her speech did not agree with passage contest. Summary of points mentioned by the professor has been explained as follow.
First, the professor admitted that like any other references the online version could contain some errors, but, the correction in online versions is much easier than a printed version type which would last for a decade.
Second, the problem that online versions are prone to hack and interlope has been solved, as described in the lecture, some people could be hired to protect these website against hackers, etc.
Third, as mentioned in the reading printed version of encyclopedia had limited space and few number of topics were covered and provided in them, but, in an online version this criteria would not be considered as a concern.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'encyclopedia'?
Suggestion: encyclopedia
... expressed the three flaws of an online encyclopedias, and compared it to traditional printed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ned by the professor has been explained as follow. First, the professor admitted tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this website' or 'these websites'?
Suggestion: this website; these websites
..., some people could be hired to protect these website against hackers, etc. Third, as m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tect these website against hackers, etc. Third, as mentioned in the reading print...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...n of encyclopedia had limited space and few number of topics were covered and provided in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ided in them, but, in an online version this criteria would not be considered as a c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 1373.03311258 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 152.0 270.72406181 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21710526316 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65202582891 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 419.366225166 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3623119947 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219481965964 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089369970007 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070795538752 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123301258068 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484137678642 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.