The passage claims that cultivating genetically modified trees on a vast area will have a lot of benefits. The lecture, on the other hand, states that they also bring up some serious problems and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The passage claims that cultivating genetically modified trees on a vast area will have a lot of benefits. The lecture, on the other hand, states that they also bring up some serious problems and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that genetically modified trees can survive in harsh conditions easier than natural trees. On the contrary, the listening rejects this by explaining that genetically modified trees are more uniform and not all of them are resistant to vast various situations. Therefore, if they face a challenging climate or infection, completely will die.
Furthermore, the reading argues that genetically modified trees grow faster than natural trees and have more fruits and woods. As a result, genetically modified trees have more economic advantageous for those who cultivate them. Conversely, the professor supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; she describes that the farmers have to pay to the company every time they grow the threes. Hence, cultivation of genetically modified trees is along with a charge cost which increases the investment of planting these kinds of trees.
Finally, the author explains that the genetically modified trees would satisfy the demand for wood and save threatened native trees, which are cutting down faster than the rate of their substitution because of firewood or building timber.
The speaker, in contrast, refutes the author's view and illustrates the idea that genetically modified trees grow more aggressively among the natural trees. Therefore, they compete for the sources of food and sunlight with each other. Growing genetically modified trees will crowding out the natural trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crowd'
Suggestion: crowd
...Growing genetically modified trees will crowding out the natural trees.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37867647059 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72283045519 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9525095734 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456192409064 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176172508192 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169872209473 0.0662205650399 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314782956521 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.328044379861 0.0443174109184 740% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.