The passage claims that there are several possible theories that scientists have proposed about the reasons of the Little Ice Age by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories are out of dated and information prove that none of these theories could be accounted for the Little Ice Age.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that disrupting of ocean currents may have caused the cooling that leads to the Little Ice Age. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this by explaining that the cooling water just happened in Europe and North America. Although, the Little Ice Age happened at the southern hemisphere.
Furthermore, the reading explains that because of the volcanic eruption, a dark cloud of dust and sulfur gas came into the atmosphere, which blocks sunlight for reaching Earth's surface and declined the global temperatures. Conversely, the professor supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; she describes that the huge clouds should have also a visual effect. Nevertheless, almost there is no report of these clouds during the Little Ice Age. As a result, this effect was not strong enough to make an effective change in temperature.
Finally, the author argues that a decrease in the human population gives rise to growing more trees on Earth. Consequently, the more trees absorb more carbon dioxide and decline the temperature. The speaker, in contrast, refutes the author's view and illustrates the idea that there was not ample time for this phenomenon. The forests would soon be down again by the human and the time of their presence on the earth, was not long enough to have a conspicuous influence.
The passage claims that there are several possible theories that scientists have proposed about the reasons of the Little Ice Age by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories are out of dated and information prove that none of these theories could be accounted for the Little Ice Age.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that disrupting of ocean currents may have caused the cooling that leads to the Little Ice Age. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this by explaining that the cooling water just happened in Europe and North America. Although, the Little Ice Age happened at the southern hemisphere.
Furthermore, the reading explains that because of the volcanic eruption, a dark cloud of dust and sulfur gas came into the atmosphere, which blocks sunlight for reaching Earth's surface and declined the global temperatures. Conversely, the professor supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; she describes that the huge clouds should have also a visual effect. Nevertheless, almost there is no report of these clouds during the Little Ice Age. As a result, this effect was not strong enough to make an effective change in temperature.
Finally, the author argues that a decrease in the human population gives rise to growing more trees on Earth. Consequently, the more trees absorb more carbon dioxide and decline the temperature. The speaker, in contrast, refutes the author's view and illustrates the idea that there was not ample time for this phenomenon. The forests would soon be down again by the human and the time of their presence on the earth, was not long enough to have a conspicuous influence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t happened in Europe and North America. Although, the Little Ice Age happened at the sou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, may, nevertheless, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01748251748 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60442338621 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6654847244 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406444077253 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128372698856 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225189534496 0.0662205650399 340% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263280030367 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.34030020993 0.0443174109184 768% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.