The reading passage discusses about various health benifits of avocado. Mainly, these benifits are stated under ability to reduce blood pressure, benifitial for pregnancy and lower cost price. However, the lecturer contradicts with the statements of the passage.
The first reason stated in the passage in order to prove avocado as salubrious food is because of copious amount of vitamins, minerals and fats like folic acid. It is stated that these nutritions would aid in lowering the blood pressure. On the contarty, the lecture opposes this position by stating that avocado has about 29 grams of fats which is equivalent to 300 Calories. If avocado consumption index is not accounted, higher consumption of avocado might result in weight gain. This eventually would minimize the health benifits of avocado.
Secondly, it is stated that avocado is quite good for pregnant woman because of higher presence of folic acids. These folic acid would aid in reducing miscarriage and neural tube disorders. But, the lecturer is against this statement. He claims that avocado is unsafe for pregnant woman because it reduces milk production in woman and might hamper the mammalary growth of woman. In addition, baby stomach are very sensitive to avocado, which is not good.
Finally, avocado is considered to be quite cheap food product and it may supplement meat consumption as it tastes like meat. Eventually, it would reduce the consumption of expensive food items like sea foods and meats. Nevertheless, the lecutere provides various exemples to prove that avocado is not cheap. He claims an avocado would cost as much as a pound of apple or a dozen of banana. Also, it requires higher amount of natural resources like water to grow avocado; which proves avocado is quite expensive.
Therefore, although the passage states health benifits of avocado, the lecturer proves these to be illogical and unreasonable. The lecturer views selecting avocado in human diet as irrelevant considering the arguments placed in the passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65189919665 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9721120377 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.05 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210604063222 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719570629718 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049641634542 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129177833555 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388174199723 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.