Nowadays the terms mordenization and civilized people come along. A society which is modern is required to have civilized people. However, the definition of civilized is not same as it used to be. People now measure civilized nature in appearance and wealth. With dominance of this view, people have started improving their appearance in fashionized manner just to be civilized. Thus, it is true that people today are prodigiously spending in clothes. There are other reasons to prove this statement which are expressed below.
The definition of appearance has changed in recent world. People used to judged on the basis of manner and character in past. But, at present people judge based on looks, fashionability and affluent lifestyles. It is common knowledge that human judge people by types of clothes worn. For example, if a person with fashoinable clothes, golden chain around his neck and well trimed hair faints in middle of a pathway, many people would go to help him. But, if the same person who is in ragged chothes, worn out shoes and rough hair faints, very few would try to aid him. It is just human nature that we instantly judge people based on appearance. So, just to be judged as better by society people are spending wrecklessly in clothes.
In addition to this the world today is pretentiuous. People are faking everything. What you see with your eyes wont be the same. People are faking just to show affluent lifestyle. It is nothing new. It is human nature that we like to appear good. What is the first thing that you would considered while making judgment that a person is rich or poor? Ofcourse, fashionable clothes, a nice watch and well polished shoes. So, just to fake richness people are buying expensive clothes and pretending to be better.
There is a misconcept among people that being mordenized is having good choice of fashion. A person who is mordern needs to have clean clothes, tight fit pants of renowned brands, jeans jacket over a hoodie and nice shoes according to our psychological definition of mordeness. We donot calculate mordenization on the basis of thoughts instead jump hurriedly in appearance. A man with baggy jeans, woolen shirt and leather cowboy shoes is considered to be old fashioned because his appearance gives us that vibe. So, in order to cope up with ever changing fashions and wrongly defined mordenization, we are attracted by expensive fashionable brands.
Therefore, we are always spending wrecklessly in clothes just because of our pretentious nature. We donot consider what our background is or how much we can afford but we just care to be accepted inside societal hierarcy of afflent group. Hence, it is competitive human nature that we always want to appear better and prosperous than other. So, to show this we are always attracted to fashionable expensive clothes because we fear of being called out- fashioned in absence of them.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ed on the basis of manner and character in past. But, at present people judge based on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
... What is the first thing that you would considered while making judgment that a person is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 15.1003584229 245% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96106557377 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71437662572 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0887031979 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7878787879 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209925310963 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560930803098 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358486621852 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125824980503 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412428577407 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ed on the basis of manner and character in past. But, at present people judge based on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
... What is the first thing that you would considered while making judgment that a person is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 15.1003584229 245% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96106557377 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71437662572 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0887031979 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7878787879 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209925310963 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560930803098 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358486621852 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125824980503 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412428577407 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.