Pluto as a planet
Both the reading and the lecture are about pluto being a planet or not. In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that Pluto is not a planet and provides three reasons to prove it. However, the professor states that many scientists do not agree that pluto is not a planet and gainsays each of the arguments mentioned in the reading by considering them weak.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that pluto cannot be considered a planet for its small size. Its mass is similar and even smaller to that of other dwarf planets, for instance, Eris. On the other hand, the professor explains that the size of pluto is not that small. If it is compared with other dwarf planets it is the largest and although the dwarfs are not many in number. He further points out that the criteria to classify the planets based on their size is illogical. He gave an example of mammals to illustrate this. He describes a blue whale and a small rat are classified into the same category as mammals. Thus, the classification according to the size does not make sense.
Next, the professor further goes into details by mentioning that pluto cannot be opt-out of the planets category if there are other objects in it's orbit. The scattering parameter has an effect on the size of the planet. He gave an example of stars to explain this. He states if there is a giant star and a small one, the scattering parameter of the small star will be less so we cannot blame pluto for its small size. These claims refute the writer's implication about the orbit of pluto having objects in its path. Thus, it cannot be considered a planet.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring that the pluto has qualities of a comet rather than a planet. Not only, it is composed of ice so a tail will appear close to the sun but also the orbital shape is irregular. Therefore, it does not resemble a planet. In contrast, the speaker refutes this proof by showing the inaccuracy of the author that it is completely false. Pluto has its own atmosphere which is composed of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane. The presence of these gases shows the availability of the gravitational pull. Also, pluto has five moons and rocky mountains. These features are not present in comet. Hence, pluto doesn not be categorized as comet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... example of mammals to illustrate this. He describes a blue whale and a small rat ...
^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...ing that pluto cannot be opt-out of the planets category if there are other objects in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...its small size. These claims refute the writers implication about the orbit of pluto ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 411.0 270.72406181 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67396593674 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52198906412 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481751824818 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 13.0662251656 199% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9524722732 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8846153846 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8076923077 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 20.0 4.27373068433 468% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444681269291 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131989779324 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114821513414 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32033271096 0.162205337803 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861420324032 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.