the possibility of life for humans on the Venus and why the professor is against it
The text discusses the chance of making permanent life for humans on Mars and Moon and provides three reasons of support why this project is not practical. On the other hand, the professor goes against stated claims and explains why he believes it is possible to have a permanent life on the Mars and Moon.
First, the text explains that the atmospheric pressure on the Venus is much greater than the Earth, and it makes everything crashed. In this way the text explains that it is impossible for humans to be able to live there. The professor goes against this point and explains that although the surface pressure of the Venus is more than the earth, but the atmospheric pressure of the Venus forty kilometers above the surface, is like the Earth and by making floating houses in that height, people can easily live there.
Second, the text discusses that the atmosphere of Venus is mostly made of carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas and lacks of any water vapor. Moreover, there is no reservoirs of water on the Venus, and it is needed to supply the water from the Earth which is really hard. The professor refutes this claim and mentions that by using some chemical reactions we can produce water from the carbon dioxide and the Sulfuric acid of the atmosphere of Venus. As the result,there is no need to supply water from the Earth.
Third, the text mentions this point that based on the presence of a thick cloud above the Venus, most of the sunlight reflect from the surface and humans cannot use solar energy as a source of their needed power. The professor rejects this point and states that although there is a thick layer of clouds above the surface of the Venus, but still it receives considerable amount of sunlight. We can also hear from him that technologies which convert the sunlight into power can use both direct and reflected sunlight, and they can even generate more Energy on the Venus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-15 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the 68
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- you prefer team work or solo work ? 70
- YOU SHOULD NOT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ IN NEWSPAPERS. 70
- Agree or not? a person should never make an important decision alone 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no reservoirs'?
Suggestion: there are no reservoirs
...and lacks of any water vapor. Moreover, there is no reservoirs of water on the Venus, and it is needed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...f the atmosphere of Venus. As the result,there is no need to supply water from the Ear...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69642857143 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3294960551 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8660707276 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278951408972 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990121267677 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758393909806 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169814614865 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10542087472 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.