Torreya taxifoha population and three ways to save them
The text discusses the decrease of the Torreya taxifoha population, and provides three possible ways which may be useful for increasing their population. On the other hand, the professor goes against these three ways, and provides some reasons why she is against them.
First, the text states that reestablishing the tree in same location which it could survive for past years can be a way to save this tree population. The professor refutes this claim and states that this way seems unlikely. She adds that some changes which are the results of global warming have changed the climate of microclimate regions. The professors also states that these regions has dried in the past years, and because of this point reestablishing the population of trees in these regions is not practical for surviving the population of Torreya taxifoha.
Second, the text claims that by relocating the population of the tree to new locations, which is named as assisted migration, scientists can save the population. It also states that in some areas which the climate is cooler, Torreya taxifoha population can grow faster and scientists can save their population by relocating them. The professor goes against this point and states that a previous experience of assisted migration showed that relocating of a tree resulted in a quick spread of the tree which declined the population of many plants and animals. She also adds that the consequences of assisted migration is unpredictable and is not a safe way.
Third, the article points that by preserving Torreya taxifoha trees in research centers, scientists can both save this tree and do so researches on it. The professor rejects this point and states that the population of Torreya taxifoha needs a large variety of trees to survive, and research centers doe not have enough capacity for this means. We can also hear from her that Torreya taxifoha trees can not resist against diseases in research centers, and as the result, this way is not a good solution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06042296073 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68249705925 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432024169184 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5210620302 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.846153846 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322042425306 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122403558334 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785375977648 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211213303354 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311507544745 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.