possibility of sending humans to Mars
The reading and the lecture both discuss the difficulties associated with the mission of sending humans to Mars. Although in the passage, the author argues the impossibility of such missions for a few reasons, the professor in the lecture proposes solutions to those. She is of the opinion that sending humans to Mars is feasible in the near future.
The first point that the professor makes is that the astronomers can exploit a method of cultivating plants, which do not need soil for their growth. These vegetations, called hydroponic, can produce food for the passengers of the spaceship while purifying the waste waster and emitting oxygen. With that technique in hand, contrary to the point that has been mentioned in the text, the astronauts can conduct interplanetary travels.
Furthermore, the professor refutes the author's opinion about zero-gravity obstacles that the astronauts may encounter after their return to Earth. She points out that the astronauts had been into the spaces for months. By doing regular exercises and taking vitamin and mineral pills, they could maintain their muscle mass and bone density. As a result, there won't be a physical limitation for astronauts traveling to Mars and coming back to Earth.
Finally, the professor argues that solar radiation is not constant. The engineers can make a small part of the spaceship resistant to such potent electromagnetic waves. Making a small part of spacecraft shielded against the radiation, not only spacecraft won't be massive, but also in the time of sun activation periods, the crow can move to that section to protect themselves from the dangerous radiations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to soil'?
Suggestion: to soil
...f cultivating plants, which do not need soil for their growth. These vegetations, ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... Furthermore, the professor refutes the authors opinion about zero-gravity obstacles th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23106060606 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83213544196 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2265259346 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111988390408 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491435249075 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107210864188 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734790640163 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10870693026 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.