Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
A university quality of education is considered very important in many cases. The quality of education can affect the future of a country in the long-run. Consequently, it would have a significant impact on society's life. I think universities need to spend more money on the salaries of the professors to encourage them to spend more time on the content quality they teach at the class. Furthermore, it will attract new talents to apply to become a university professor.
Firstly, I think if the professors receive an increase in the salary, it will set their minds free of other life problems. As a result, it would help them concentrate on the content they teach at classes and the research that they are conducting in the labs. For example, when I was a student at a university in Kerman, the professors had a low income. The economic problem forced them to choose a second job to help with the situation. That resulted in a delay in grading the final exams and put stress on us as students. Moreover, the professors couldn't make complementary files like lecture notes for each lecture. Therefore they asked the graduate students to write one for the next semester. The time spent by the professors on their second job could have been spent inside the university if only they had received a higher salary.
Secondly, I believe when the universities pay a higher salary to the professors, more talent will be attracted to apply for job positions in the universities. That will affect the quality of education in the sense that if more talented people join the university, the higher the quality of research. For example, when I got admitted to the Isfahan University of Technology, opposite to the Kerman University, the professors had a higher income. Consequently, the talented Ph.D. graduates were more interested in joining the Isfahan University. In the long run, Isfahan University surpassed the Kerman University in the international universities ranking. The money that a university spends on the professors' salary shouldn't be considered unimportant. It can affect the overall performance of the university in the long term situation.
Overall, I think universities need to spend more money on the salaries of university professors. I believe this because it helps the professors to concentrate on what they are doing in the university instead of financial difficulties that they might encounter in their daily life. Furthermore, the higher salaries will attract talented newcomers, especially the prodigies in each field, to the university, which will significantly influence its performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...s as students. Moreover, the professors couldnt make complementary files like lecture n...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...es like lecture notes for each lecture. Therefore they asked the graduate students to wri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e money that a university spends on the professors salary shouldnt be considered unimporta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...versity spends on the professors salary shouldnt be considered unimportant. It can affec...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14858490566 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0519624309 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450471698113 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6396518753 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9130434783 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361084546701 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113495669557 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969382905285 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24946257882 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826642789235 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.