possibility of sending humans to Mars
The reading and the lecture both discuse the difficulties of the mission of sending human to Mars. Although in the reading the author argues the impossibility of such mission, the professor in the lecture a few solutions to those. She is of a opinion that sending human to Mars is feasible in near future.
The first point that the professor makes is that the astronuts can use a method of cultivating plants that do not need soild for their growth. This vegerations which are called hydropoize can produce food for the passangers of the spaceship while purifing the waste waster and emiting oxygen. With that technique in hand, contrary to the point that has been mentioned in the text, the astronumers can travel to long distances.
Furthermore, the professors refutes the author's opinion about zero-gravity obstecles that the astromoners may encounter after their return to Earth. She points out that the astonomers had been into the sapces for month and by doing regular exercise and taking vitamin and mineral pills the could maintain their muscle mass and bone density. As a result, there won't be a physical limitation for astonumers for traveling to Mars and coming back to Earth.
Finally, the professor argues that the solar radiation is not constant and the engineers can make small part of the spaceship resistant to such potent electronic waves. By making small part of spaceship shielded against the radiation not only spacecarf won't be heavy, but also in the time of sun activation periods, the crow can move to that section to protect themselves from the dangarous radiations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ure a few solutions to those. She is of a opinion that sending human to Mars is f...
^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...Furthermore, the professors refutes the authors opinion about zero-gravity obstecles th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66139148341 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7162790033 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114158719248 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592614129473 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116525069937 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763781175309 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113410161881 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.