The possibility of traveling to mars by humans
The passage and the talk both discuss the possibility of human travelling to the mars. The writer contends that because of many problems its impossible to go to trip to the mars by human being. The lecturer, however, refutes the author assessments. She demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that there is not enough shipment space to take all necessary food, water and oxygen for the astronauts for two years- the time that a mars trip would take. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that passengers of the spaceship can use hydroponics process to gain their vital materials. using this method, they can cultivate grains that they need to feed on them in the water instead of soul. She further asserts that astronauts can use wasting water by evaporating it and making fresh water to drink. Also, the herbs they grew in the spacecraft transforms carbon dioxide into the oxygen, compensating for air limitations.
Second, according to the text, zero gravity condition has many detrimental effects on the humans so much so that makes them unable to survive for two years on the mars; although, the speaker finds this idea debatable. She bolsters her opinion by stating that astronauts have many practices for this problem and are prepared for this unfavorable condition. For example, they do some particular exercises and also use some drugs like calcium to reduce the destructive impact of zero gravity situation.
Lastly, the lecture contradicts this fallacy of the passage that it is impossible to add shield to spaceship in order to protect them from space radiation, saying that radiations are not always dangerous. What is more, spacecraft could be equipped with some detectors which alarm whenever the amount of radiations become hazardous. Also, they can add a small safe capsule for this dangerous condition for people to take shelter in there, and it would not result in so much extra weight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... go to trip to the mars by human being. The lecturer, however, refutes the author a...
^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...process to gain their vital materials. using this method, they can cultivate grains ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, second, so, for example, in contrast, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62088004079 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3361378497 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113359303835 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434001714505 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993878989958 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911630526997 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127852750891 0.0443174109184 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.