Procrastinational problem affects of people life in a job or project.
In this set of materials, the author and the professor are discussing the impacts of procrastination problem over the people life. They are largely discordant with each other while the writer argues that procrastination is simple disorder other maintain that she claim risky result if it is not treatment. İt poses some reasons; spend time, delay to work other day, and blaming external factors when they work on a job or other thing. The professor invalidates the author assertions; in all aspects and demonstrates that procrastination serious disorder; it affects people life. The details of the professor’s refutation are revealed in the following paragraphs respectively.
Firstly, Procrastination affects people who can not spend time productively. They work on a Project which includes details about plans or structural analyze; they tend to delay other day. Moreover, they want whole conditions are on way, and there is no serious problem. İf a problem happen suddenly in the Project, they may withstand on whole Project. These people are not perform stable behaviours that may gives some hazard for work place communication.
Secondly, they tend to postpone Works, visits, and meetings in order to escape responsibility. İt shows randomly progress, although you aware of the disorders.You should monitored seriously, and gives report to managers or head of Office.
Thirdly, they try to blame external factors during a Project or job so that is not taken responsibility among the workers. Because of this behave, other workers have more job or possible risks. Risk is an external factor that occur with important conditions any time; because they are found with you.
Tos um up, Procrastination may be treatment due to a therapy in the clinical center or monitored an experienced advisor. This serious problem can not ignore long time in the work condition. These people require interest for treatment; you should be behave objectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of materials, the author and...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e following paragraphs respectively. Firstly, Procrastination affects people ...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they tend to delay other day. Moreover, they want whole conditions are on way, a...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'performed'.
Suggestion: performed
... on whole Project. These people are not perform stable behaviours that may gives some h...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: You
...ss, although you aware of the disorders.You should monitored seriously, and gives r...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port to managers or head of Office. Thirdly, they try to blame external fact...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e; because they are found with you. Tos um up, Procrastination may be treatm...
^^^
Line 8, column 253, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'behaved'?
Suggestion: behaved
...e interest for treatment; you should be behave objectively.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37987012987 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05675740158 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6084680548 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0555555556 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 4.45695364238 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306192238816 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902814864321 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917480436842 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140720465157 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997013654257 0.0443174109184 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.