Both the reading and lecturer offer opposing views on whether the attending TV shows for professors have good or bad effects. While the passage supports the professor presence on television, the speaker repudiates the point by presenting some facts.
First, the article mentions that professors appearance on television is beneficial for them and at the same time it enhances their reputation in the academic field. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that professor coming as guest in the television programs are not treated as serious scholar by their colleagues. Moreover, they are not invited for the conference and find it difficult to arrange money for the research as they are considered as teacher who prefer entertainment over doing research work. In addition to this, professor invests time in the prepration of the topic to be discussed in the television program. Therefore, he waste his time in getting ready for the cameras and in the travelling whereas, this time can be utilized in doing research work, meeting students and in some university's business.
Second, the passage posits that it is beneficial for the public watching the program as they can get good knowledge on the topic discussed by the professor. The lecturer rebuts this point by saying that television program do not want any intellectual substance instead they prefer entertaining stuff. Moreover, the speaker states that a TV reporter can deliver the same topic efficiently by doing some home-work.
Clearly, disparity exists between reading and the listening, but the lecturer's evidence are legitimate and tangible. Thus, the reading fails to justify its point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws on whether the attending TV shows for professors have good or bad effects. Whi...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ts. First, the article mentions that professors appearance on television is beneficial ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31203007519 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78964847556 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3509847399 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189718416017 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670763653153 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652764988646 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104580774343 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726614845345 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.