Professor benefit from appearing on televisiom | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Professor benefit from appearing on televisiom

Both in the reading passage and the lecture, the author is talking about whether the professor should appear on television or not. The reading passage argues three points as follows: the professor benefits from the appearance, the university too benefits from the professor's appearance and lastly the public gains knowledge from their favourite professor. But in the lecture it contradicts all the three points mentioned.

First of all, the author contends that the professor benefit from appearing on televison as they acquire reputation in their respected academic field and also gain audience. In the contrast, the lecturer argues that the appearance on televiion is not good for professor as it decreases their reputation in their feild. People or academic scholars would not consider the professor as a serious scholar but rather just see them as a mere entertainer. The professor might not get invited to important conferences and also face difficulty in getting money for their research work due to their television appearance.

Secondly, the author argues that the university receive positive publicity when their university's professor appear on television. But in opposition, the lecturer argues that the professor loose a lot of time. The time spent on doing rehearsals, makeup, dressing up, figuring out the speech, etc can be well spent on doing research work, meeting students, doing business meetings, etc.

Lastly, the author says that the public gains from professor's knowledge and expertise. At times it is difficult to meet the professor as they are busy but this would give them a chance to learn from the professor themself. But the lecturer refutes by saying that the television only showcases the entertainment and not serious academic lecture as it is not eye catching. The television shows background, movie version of literature work, achievements, etc. So, the television doesn't really show full expert lecture and reality.

Votes

Essay Categories

Integrated TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e, the university too benefits from the professors appearance and lastly the public gains ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gains'' or 'gain's'?
Suggestion: gains'; gain's
...essors appearance and lastly the public gains knowledge from their favourite professo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students, doing business meetings, etc. Lastly, the author says that the public ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., achievements, etc. So, the television doesnt really show full expert lecture and rea...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, well, talking about, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38110749186 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79779342317 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527687296417 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7526380157 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348342977283 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118723601813 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133498212276 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226117630872 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124567944108 0.0443174109184 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, well, talking about, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments