professor's in the TV program
The reading and the lecturer are both about whether Professors will attend in a television program or not. The author of the reading feels that there are three possible reasons for participating in the TV program. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that these* reasons which the author explained aren't convincing.
To begin with, the author argues that joining a television program is beneficial for Professors. The article mentions that not only academic scholars but also people all around the world can see the Professor which will enhance his academic importance. This specific argument this *challenges by the author. He notes that Professor himself won't be benefited *from attending TV programs because it will make himself less serious researcher rather entertainer. Additionally, the author says, from this belief he won't be invited to many academic conferences which will hamper his research work by decreasing the fund.
Secondly, the writer suggests that educational institute will also be benefited from this. In the article, it is said that people after watching TV can be familiar with the professor as well as will get some insights about the university. The Lecturer, however, disputes this by acknowledging that Professors have to waste a lot of time to attend such TV shows like time for travel, makeup, or other preparations. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that this time could be used in research or teaching that may help both students and institute.
Finally, the author posits that viewers also get some insight from *these shows. Moreover, in the article it is mentioned that this program generally not so enigmatic which helps common people to get scientific or any academic idea. In contrast, lecturer position is that public doesn't actually get any actual idea. He notes that TV producers of this kind of program are generally focused on current or non academic topic which hampers to get proper academic comprehension.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns for participating in the TV program. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ese* reasons which the author explained arent convincing. To begin with, the autho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that educational institute will also be benefited from this. In the article, it ...
^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me could be used in research or teaching that may help both students and institut...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...trast, lecturer position is that public doesnt actually get any actual idea. He notes ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, kind of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17484662577 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72164035229 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9414956667 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2352941176 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263636659322 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866526088075 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952516674443 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173552624555 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481748839618 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.