Professors' appear on TV
According to the reading passage, there are three main advantages that professors appear in media. However, the lecture casts doubt on the reading by using a number of points that are contrary to that view.
To begin with, the reading passage claims that professors, who participate in diverse TV programs gain recognition as authorities among not only students but also a wider audience. On another hand, based on the lecture those, who are involved in media, usually are considered rather as entertainers than scholars. As a result, TV professors are usually not invited to vital conferences or researches.
In addition, the author of a reading passage points that not only professors benefit from appearing in TV shows but also universities. When public observes an intelligent faculty member, they usually think highly about college. In contrary, according to the lecture attending, appearing in TV shows is extremely time-consuming. Professors spend much time rehearsing and traveling. Instead, they can use that time for preparing to lectures and doing researches.
Finally, the reading passage put forwards that public also gains from professors’ attending shows. TV viewers learn something new that they have never heard before. However, according to the lecture, TV network has no intention to engross into wider knowledge and all that viewers need is an academic title.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts that are contrary to that view. To begin with, the reading passage claim...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... media, usually are considered rather as entertainers than scholars. As a result,...
^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to vital conferences or researches. In addition, the author of a reading pas...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'lecture'.
Suggestion: lecture
...they can use that time for preparing to lectures and doing researches. Finally, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to lectures and doing researches. Finally, the reading passage put forward...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51152073733 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96666122235 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617511520737 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9713323 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323001811962 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106932474598 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922890510613 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174126896096 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046098658439 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.