Professors are normally found in university classrooms, office, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in these television appearances are of great benefit to the professors themselves as well as to their universities and the general
Professors benefit from appearing on television because by doing so they acquire reputations as authorities in their academic among a much wider audience than they have on campus. If a professor publishes views in an academic journal, only after scholars learn about and appreciate those views. But when a professor appears on TV. thousands of people outside the narrow academic community become aware of the professor's ideas. So when professors share their ideas with a television audience,the professors importance as scholars is enhanced.
Universities also benefit from such appearances. The universities receive positive publicity when their professors appear on TV. When people see a knowledgeable faculty member of a university on television, they think more highly of that university. That then leads to an improved reputation for the university. And that improved reputation in tum leads to more donations for the university and more to applications from potential students
Finally, the public gains from professors appearing on television. Most television viewers normally have no contact with university professors. When professors appear on television viewers have a chance to learn from experts and to be exposed to view they might otherwise never hear about Television is generally a medium for commentary that tends to be superficial,not deep or thoughtful From the professors on television, by contrast, viewers get a taste of real expertise and insight.
The article is about the topic Professor’s on television. Moreover, the writer discusses the benefits of professors coming on to television media. However, In the listening the listener is quick to point out the flaw in the writer's claims. In fact, the listener believes that there are no such real benefits for the professors coming on the television media. She questions the various benefits stated in the article.
First, the reading claims that coming on television is beneficial to professor as it gives them a reputation as authorities in the academic fields among a much wider audience. The listener refutes this point by saying that the professor who comes on television are not that much scholar in their field, they are not much admired by the scholars in that particular field also they tend to get uninvited to important conference because of such publicity. One another consequence could be not getting enough money for their research work.
Second, the article posits that because of such appearances by professor the universities tend to get benefits from it. It states that because of their professors on television media, people think high of the university which in turn lead to increase in donation and potential application of students. The listener rebut this point by explaining that to come on television the professor needs to do a lot of rehearsal also a significant amount of time is wasted in travelling, getting ready for the show and much more. According to listener this much time can be used by the professor in meeting with student, attending potential conference on some topic and continuing their research work.
Third, the reading says that the normal public get benefited because of it as they tend to get introduce to new interesting topic and expert views on some issues by the professors. The listener opposes this point by mentioning that the television media doesn't want to show some serious work on the channel at dinner time. Instead they want only academic title to showcase not the intellectual work, which can easily be completed by a trained reporter. she finally states that the viewers want entertainment, which the television media completely shows.
To sum up, both the writer's and the listener hold conflicting views about the topic. It's clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...l application of students. The listener rebut this point by explaining that to come o...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 254, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...by mentioning that the television media doesnt want to show some serious work on the c...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ous work on the channel at dinner time. Instead they want only academic title to showca...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ily be completed by a trained reporter. she finally states that the viewers want en...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12307692308 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.758608545 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489743589744 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5492542668 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178103669807 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549610642058 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348799115745 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937796023596 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056584332416 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.