The reading and the lecture are both about universities' professors appearing on TV as guests on television news program to give their expert comments, the author of the reading feels that this is a good thing for three reasons. The lecturer however, challenges the author claims. She is of the opposite opinion that it is not a good thing.
First, the author of the reading argues that by appearing on TV they acquire reputations as authorities in their academic fields. the article mention that when a professor publish his or her work in a academic journal; he or she wont have that wide audience compared with TV. this argument is challenged by the lecturer, she claims that when a professor appear on TV he is not taken seriously, and researchers among other people would think of his as an entertainer.
Secondly, the author of the reading suggests that it is good for the universities to have their professors appearing om TV as the public will think high of them. and overall this will encourage student to enroll and people to donate more money to the universities. the lecturer rebuts this thought by pointing out that the time needed to prepare and practice and the appearance it self would cost the universities valuable time which will affect the research outputs and quality and make the professors less available for the students.
Lastly the reading point that the public would also benefit from having professors giving them deeper and trustworthy knowledge,however the lecturer does not agree with this, saying that the viewers are not interested in this type of a deep knowledge in the best cases professors will not provide more than a reporter who had done his homework.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading and the lecture are about altur...
^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...truism acts gain nothing for themselfs. the lectuerer challenges the claims made by...
^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...allenges the claims made by the author. she is of the opinion that that those indiv...
^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...de by the author. she is of the opinion that that those individuals recieve approval and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...red to it as non-material benefites. to begin with, the author argues that in m...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...to assist other members of their group. the author mention the meerkat as an exampl...
^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...ther members of their group. the author mention the meerkat as an example. he claims th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...thor mention the meerkat as an example. he claims that an indivdual acts as a sent...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...lready have; looking out for predators. this argumnet is challenged by the lectuerer...
^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...rgumnet is challenged by the lectuerer. she claims accordaing to recent studies tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...t this 'sentinel' had already ate before standing guard, so he is doing t...
^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...at on a full stomack unlike the others. and it is often more diffecult to find food...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... is often more diffecult to find food. secondly, the author suggests that this sentinel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...so he revels himself to greater dangor. the lecturer,however, rebuts this by mentio...
^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
... himself to greater dangor. the lecturer,however, rebuts this by mentioning that since t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8612244898 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74603193328 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6789010512 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.272727273 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 4.19205298013 358% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768011840887 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284122986895 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278995437475 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472096327132 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151564497855 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.