professors should appear on TV or they should not.
The lecture and the reading passage is about the apperance or participation of professors on tv.The reading passage gives its three reasons to support the idea of participation of university professors on TV. While the lecture conrtadicts all of it's three reasons of support and give three reasons those are totally against the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading passage cliams that if professors those are found in classrooms,libraries and busy in doing research, if they appear on TV and give their expert opinios in different TV programs, these progarms will be of great importance and will benefit the general public. In contast the lecture contradicts this statement and states that, it has disadvantages and this appearance on TV will not give good reputation to that professor and he won't be able to get invitations from the conferences.
Secondly the passage posits that if the professor from any university will appear on TV, that university will get more and more donations and positive publicity and will get more students applications.The professor opposes this idea and cliams that TV appearnce will be vey time consuming, which can waste professor's time.Especially rehersal, camera makeups and many other issues which can effect the time of the professor, that time can be beneficial for the students and can be good for research.In result the benefits which can be given to student can be spoiled.
Finally, the reading passage states that, the viewers can get a taste of real expertise and can get insight if any professor appears on TV screen,this idea is opposed by professor,by this statement that all the history and other infos can be given by any reporter, so its not necessary that professor should visit any TV program.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ce or participation of professors on tv.The reading passage gives its three reasons...
^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , libraries
...professors those are found in classrooms,libraries and busy in doing research, if they app...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...f great importance and will benefit the general public. In contast the lecture contradicts thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...and will get more students applications.The professor opposes this idea and cliams ...
^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Especially
...suming, which can waste professors time.Especially rehersal, camera makeups and many other...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e students and can be good for research.In result the benefits which can be given ...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...ht if any professor appears on TV screen,this idea is opposed by professor,by this st...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
...screen,this idea is opposed by professor,by this statement that all the history and...
^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor should visit any TV program.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14335664336 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9754587356 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472027972028 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 21.2450331126 221% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.350423694 49.2860985944 279% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 245.166666667 110.228320801 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.6666666667 21.698381199 220% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235801848906 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123036253435 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688886197201 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148143314916 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580409543659 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.6 13.3589403974 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 11.0289183223 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.42 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.498013245 198% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.