Professors in television
The lecture and reading are both about the professor activities about interviewing on television. The author of the reading believes that it is beneficial for the university as well as the public by the involvement of professor in the television news programs and talks. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. He is of the opinion that though it seem to be beneficial, however, it is actually not good for the professor as well as the university to get the university professor being involved in the television industry.
Firstly, the author claims suggest that it would be beneficial to the professor himself by appearing in such activities. He mentions that appearing on the television would increase the audience of the professor and more people would be aware about the professor work. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He says that it would decrease the professors' reputation among his fellow professor. Because of which he may be excluded from the important seminars and may also find difficulty in obtaining the money for carrying out research works.
Secondly, the author contends that the university would also be benefited from the professors interview. The author claims that the professors' view would be watched by several people and would get to know about the university. This may in turn work as an advertising.
The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that this would disadvantageous as lesser time would be spent on the research activities. He elaborates by mentioning that the time spent on the rehearsal and the makeup for the interview would have been better utilized for the innovative works and research activities. It would be better if the time was spent on guiding the student in their research activities.
Finally, it states that public would get better knowledge from the interview. The author establishes that when professor appears on the television then his view would be seen by many public and they can get the taste of real experience and insight. The lecture, on the other hand posits that televisions tend to have very less time and would only allow to present the idea of the lecture superficially and without proper depth. He put forward the idea that the interview of the professor would be somewhat similar to that of the news reporter who had a detail investigation on the subject matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 76
- Joint family 66
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 66
- Professors in television 73
- young people enjoy life more than older people do 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the television news programs and talks. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...or. He is of the opinion that though it seem to be beneficial, however, it is actual...
^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ure. He says that it would decrease the professors reputation among his fellow professor. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1373.03311258 145% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0637755102 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81522526346 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436224489796 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6943659394 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298210006445 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110995029101 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118224070372 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19954685456 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125847175362 0.0443174109184 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.