pterosaurs'fly

Essay topics:

pterosaurs'fly

According to this passage, the author give some examples to prove that pterosaurs maybe have the capable of powered flight. However, the listening matirel casts serious doubt on what the reading claims.

First of all, the author asserts that pterosaurs are possibaly cold-blooded animal. This kind of animal always can not do some motions like flying. But the speaker contends that they are warm-blooded animal because they can dance coorprated with others in the recently reseach, whereas cold-blooded animals almost can not dance.

Secondly, the pterosaurs have a heavy weight as the author claims, so they have been limited to the speed of flap wings. On the contrary, the professor give an possibility that their bone maybe not solid, like airbone, so they can also have a bunky size but not heavy too much.

Finally, author want to contends that the pterosaurs' legs is too weak to let them run fast or jump high to a fly. Also, the professor alleges that they have four legs to push them off the land instead of two hinds, even their legs'muscle is not so strong, but it is enough for them to launch.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...nce. Secondly, the pterosaurs have a heavy weight as the author claims, so they have been...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...gs. On the contrary, the professor give an possibility that their bone maybe not s...
^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'contend'.
Suggestion: contend
...vy too much. Finally, author want to contends that the pterosaurs legs is too weak to...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, kind of, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84293193717 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3974941918 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2302017867 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796185494487 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399248379791 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453272474992 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504129131004 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101645396666 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.