Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.
The author of the article states that using glass as a material in buildings is dangerous for birds and provides three solutions to solve this problem. In contrast, the professor explains the solutions outlined in the passage are not effective and repudiates author's opinion.
Firstly, according to the reading substituting regular glass with one-way glass is a good solution which prevents birds to go through glass. On the other hand, the lecturer discusses that since one-way glass acts like a mirror, birds cannot recognize the things that they see in the mirror is just reflection. As a result, they are prone to crash with one-way glass.
In addition, the author of the text emphasizes that painting lines or other patterns such as thin stripes would prevent birds to go through glass. However, the speaker is skeptical about this solution, as painted patterns misleads birds. Therefore, they would go into clear parts of glass, unless the stripes become extremely thick. In other words, extremely small unpainted area of glass makes the building so dark from inside and not beneficial.
Finally, the text makes it clear that synthetic magnetic field would guide birds to go away from glass and avoid them to be injured. On the contrary, the professor indicates that birds are using their magnetic ability to find their way while they are traveling long distances. Indeed, traveling through a city, they make advantage of their eyes and light. Therefore, magnetic guide is not useful to direct them to go away from glass of buildings.
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in other words', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242957746479 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.161971830986 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0985915492958 0.0723426182421 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528169014085 0.0435111971325 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0387323943662 0.0277247811725 140% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137323943662 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0352112676056 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47286720835 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352112676056 0.0208969081088 168% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0880281690141 0.128158765124 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140845070423 0.0158828679856 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00352112676056 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1548.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09448818898 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362204724409 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287401574803 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208661417323 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125984251969 0.113142543107 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47286720835 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 54.1945682955 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5384615385 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8593432368 49.3711431718 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.2786190188 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.63888888889 1.90840788429 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356119185464 0.549887131256 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117027572378 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0581171150442 0.0787303798458 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587876898558 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130282191989 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160043967398 0.266732575781 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105979154884 0.103435571967 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320714752258 0.414875509568 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0184597845789 0.0530846634433 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268152550578 0.40443939384 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817300451179 0.0528353158467 155% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.