Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The author of the article claims that storing patient's medical information in electronic systems would be beneficial and provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor states that keeping electronic record is not advantageous and repudiates the benefits outlined in the article.
Firstly, according to the reading, using medical record systems would results saving money on retaining and transferring patients' data and easy access to patient's records for doctors. On the other hand, the speaker argues that since doctors need to backup the information and sign some official documents, they are more prone to keep using papers along electronic systems. As a result, money saving from this approach is not significant.
In addition, the author of the passage emphasizes that electronic record systems would decrease errors of illegible handwriting. On the contrary, the lecturer implies that as doctors write their notes about patients' situations on papers and pass them to their staff to enter the records through the system, there are still some errors of reading the handwriting that is inevitable.
Finally, the text makes it clear that medical research can be done easily by using electronic systems, because it is possible to gather large amount of information from patients' records. However, the professor explains that it is so complicated for researchers to reach data, since some privacy rules has been conducted which do not let researchers to access private data from patients. It is impossible, unless they gain permission from different organizations and patients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ing, using medical record systems would results saving money on retaining and transferr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: CAN_BACKUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to back up'?
Suggestion: to back up
... speaker argues that since doctors need to backup the information and sign some official ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, in addition, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63414634146 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00386425724 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8652895736 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0372732700968 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156150223501 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0135398288715 0.0662205650399 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0229753274869 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106450365989 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.