Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The article states that it is impossible to make Venus as a permanent residence for humans and provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor explains that living in Venus is possible and repudiates the points outlined in the reading.
Firstly, the lecturer implies that humans can float in the atmosphere of Venus to avoid from being crushed by landing due to high pressure. He specifies that as long as humans do not land on the surface of Venus, there is safe for them. On the other hand, according to the passage, due to high pressure at Venus' surface, anything would be crushed by landing on its area.
In addition, the speaker discusses that lack of water and oxygen is not vital, since carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acids contain oxygen and water. Therefore, she indicates that there is an opportunity to produce water and oxygen by some chemical processes. However, the author of the passage emphasizes that scarce resource of water and oxygen makes Venus an improper choice for permanent living. Moreover, the reading makes it clear that importing water and oxygen from Earth is not a feasible solution.
Finally, the instructor points out that as the cloud above the planet is not thick and reflect significant amount of lights, it is feasible to have some energy to produce sufficient amount of electricity. On the contrary, the reading includes some information on lacks of sunlight in the Venus' surface, as a result of thick clouds above the planet, which is the cause of reflecting lights. Therefore, the text states that human could not get enough electricity.
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267558528428 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.14381270903 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0769230769231 0.0723426182421 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0401337792642 0.0435111971325 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0234113712375 0.0277247811725 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160535117057 0.128828473217 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0301003344482 0.0370669169778 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58767782392 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267558528428 0.0208969081088 128% => OK
Particles: 0.00334448160535 0.00154638098197 216% => OK
Determiners: 0.100334448161 0.128158765124 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0100334448161 0.0158828679856 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00334448160535 0.0114777025283 29% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1608.0 1645.83664459 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 271.125827815 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380597014925 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279850746269 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205223880597 0.187439937562 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115671641791 0.113142543107 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58767782392 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.0691147769 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3333333333 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9097049544 49.3711431718 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 50.3184079602 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.20967741935 1.90840788429 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396118941982 0.549887131256 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150074287314 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0798500633534 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.657616051557 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11770928103 0.139662658121 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201560239495 0.266732575781 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126875473311 0.103435571967 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295618432601 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0604659932415 0.0530846634433 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306056545432 0.40443939384 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860650080142 0.0528353158467 163% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.