The reading stands for making teams as a superb approach to command projects, the latter in order to meet the main requirements and goals. According to some mentioned advantages, the paragraphs argue that teams are willing to respond quickly, to enhance member's creativity, and to obtain more significant results. On the other hand, the lecturer challenges the pros as mentioned above and provides a business case in which teams were not the best option. In this regard, the lecturer casts doubt into three main points.
The case's enterprise turned some "normal projects" into "team projects," and later checked the results in six months. While the reading posits that individual contributions are recognized as a whole in overall outcomes, the lecture mentions that the results and member's perceptions were the opposite. As the rewards are shared, their attitude was less collaborative. For instance, the free-rider behavior was present.
The second point is about the movement or capacity to react. The passage maintains that teams are keen to carry out the project quickly and orderly, it means providing specific and specialized solutions to issues. Regrettably, the team members did not perform as fast as it was predicted since they could not reach consensus. As a result, the project's flow was quite slow.
Third, the influence of members can create both pros and cons. The paragraphs summarize that members who represent or make decisions are willing to consider the team approach. Justification for that behavior is that teams are entirely accountable. However, and according to the case, the lecturer confirms that influencers were likely to drop ideas they dislike and go on projects that may not work. As a result, other members ("non-influencers") ignored the decisions they did not accept.
Conclusions about the way to approach teams are opposite in both the lecture and reading passage. As the project performance is not guaranteed in teams, it is addable that bad results are shared, and the blame is placed in al the members of the group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...s doubt into three main points. The cases enterprise turned some 'normal pro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... projects' into 'team projects,' and later checked the results in six m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35240963855 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06905540895 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539156626506 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1952341682 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5263157895 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898748536454 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289119074018 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342804446677 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054215640665 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225938864153 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.