Animals and pets have taken part in societies since our ancient civilizations. For instance, Egyptians admired cats, for example, remarkable Faraons (like Cleopatra) adopted them; Aztecs personified in jaguars their outstanding warriors, and Hindi consider cows as holy animals. In some jurisdictions, pets are subjects of rights and responsibilities for owners. In this regard, our common sense tells us that pets are not just things or stuff. According to my background and current status, I consider that pets ought to be treated like any family member. Some arguments are cogently explained below.
First, any pet is a source of duties and responsibilities. Then, family members have to care for them as well as invest or waste in their needs. For example, owners who have pets are willing to pay for pet's healthcare, food, and even clothes or special features. In this regard, there is no objection to see them as family members. Going ahead, most people travel with their pets in airplanes, visit shopping centers with them, and when it is not possible, they pay for hotels to avoid pet's solitude. I'm quite sure that most owners maintain that pets are as important as children; what's more, they sometimes call them son or daughter.
Secondly, it is a commonplace that pets are a full source of cuteness and love. Pets love a proper treatment, and to please them is not complicated or unaffordable. My dog is not only lovely but also aware of that. In fact, he only needs individual cookies and a daily long walk to be happy. Family's retribution is utterly greater than the sacrifices we do. As a matter of fact, my dog protects us, makes us happy, and makes us remember that simple things are better. My mother frequently asks me about my pet, and she does so before asking about my daughter - her blood family member.
Third, and according to our demographic instance, we can see that many young couples have pets. The reasons are very varied, but some are remarkable. A lot of people avoid or postpone pregnancy; others are directly and unfortunately infertile; others are gays, and their options to give birth or adopt are small; others want to reduce life cost and decide to start a family with a pet instead of having kids. Those options are mostly standard. However, all of them lead to see families with pets. So, pets are their passion and fulfillment in some cases. Moreover, we can recall retired people who decided to start a new stage with a pet since children are living their own lives. Considering pets as family members is a valid and even justified decision.
In short, treating pets like family members is valid and even positive. They protect us, entertain us, relax us. In many cases are the only way to have an inconditional friend; in others, it is just a personal preference we should not disagree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... pay for hotels to avoid pets solitude. Im quite sure that most owners maintain th...
^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...that pets are as important as children; whats more, they sometimes call them son or d...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, as a matter of fact, as well as, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85360824742 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66041664566 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550515463918 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0457652198 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4666666667 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212113624792 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557271665735 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482905657524 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116209616298 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219881582569 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.