The article and the lecture both discusses about the first human domestication of grain. The reading states that the human bake bread first from the wheat whereas the lecture had contrast view that the beer was the first product of the wheat.
As stated in the reading, the what was grinded by the early people to make it easier to eat instead of chewing it raw. The speaker argues this specific point that in order to make them soft people might soaked it first which then turns into sprouted wheat. Sprouted wheat are easier for the early people than grinding it.
Additionally, the lecture claims that the sprouted wheat when kept for over time with the exposure of air started to ferment. The fermentation process was founded by then. This contradicts the specific point from the reading, the grinded past allowed to sit and began fermenting.
Finally, the professor posits that people would not think to bake the wheat. The point is made that the early people do not cook things. The point made by the lecture casts doubt on the reading. It seems like beer was the first wheat food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article and the lecture both discuss...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was the first product of the wheat. As stated in the reading, the what was g...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the early people than grinding it. Additionally, the lecture claims that th...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'sitting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sitting
...m the reading, the grinded past allowed to sit and began fermenting. Finally, t...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allowed to sit and began fermenting. Finally, the professor posits that peopl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76439790576 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16289306522 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.984854067 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8333333333 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197350789188 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929511494752 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121088584909 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129841110227 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766719747637 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 53.8541721854 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 11.0289183223 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.