remembrandt
The article and the lecturer both discuss about the painting made by the dutch painter "Remembrandt", which is known as "Potrait of an Elderly women in a white bonnet". The article mentions that the painting was not originally painted by the remembrandt. However, the lecturer refutes this by mentioning few points which is discussed below.
First, the reading mentions about the fur collar of women, which indicates luxury in the painting. But, the remembrandt paints follows perfect details, so claiming that this painting is not a work of him. The lecture refutes this point. The researchers have concluded that the fur collar was added up to the painting after 100 years to enhance the look of the women in the painting.
Additionally, the added fur collar is not in the light shade. Because of its dark shade which absorbs light, completely eliminates the face. When it is painted in the light shade, the face could be reflective.
Finally, the author argues about the panel that was made by gluing several pieces of wood. But, the lecture says, the wood was added to the wood panel, while adding the fur collar to the painting. To improve the quality and the value of painting, several wood were added to the original panel. However, the original panel was examined and found out that it is the wood which was used by the remembrandt in other paintings. This contradicts the doubt regarding the panel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...is known as 'Potrait of an Elderly women in a white bonnet'. The article me...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g few points which is discussed below. First, the reading mentions abou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e look of the women in the painting. Additionally, the added fur collar is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shade, the face could be reflective. Finally, the author argues about the pan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00416666667 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82257454876 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6226881903 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0666666667 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135510030052 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494109533233 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849045236742 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831888672524 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062307174842 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.